<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mark Vaughn&#039;s Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mvaughn.us/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us</link>
	<description>Weblog of Mark Vaughn, an IT professional and vExpert specializing in Enterprise Architecture, virtualization, web architecture and general technology evangelism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by mvaughn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>mvaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, Jason. I totally agree, few people would actually use it. However, it looks REALLY bad to not have the option. The phone is the one device people ALWAYS have with them, and the first device I am always asked about when clients are discussed. To now have it on the menu is a serious oversight. If you think few people will use it, then spend very little time on the features/functionality and release a more simple/plain client.

I agree more will moved to published apps over time, but we are not there yet (I stress yet).

One big bump in the road here is that the new 3D features in View 5 require disabling RDP. That forces me to chose between using the new features and never being able to access the pool from my iPhone (WYSE Pocketcloud is RDP only), or to leave the new features disabled because VMware implemented them with a requirement that the iPhone cannot meet without a PCoIP capable client.

It is like a 2 iron. No one uses it, but who wants to buy a set of golf clubs without a 2 iron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Jason. I totally agree, few people would actually use it. However, it looks REALLY bad to not have the option. The phone is the one device people ALWAYS have with them, and the first device I am always asked about when clients are discussed. To now have it on the menu is a serious oversight. If you think few people will use it, then spend very little time on the features/functionality and release a more simple/plain client.</p>
<p>I agree more will moved to published apps over time, but we are not there yet (I stress yet).</p>
<p>One big bump in the road here is that the new 3D features in View 5 require disabling RDP. That forces me to chose between using the new features and never being able to access the pool from my iPhone (WYSE Pocketcloud is RDP only), or to leave the new features disabled because VMware implemented them with a requirement that the iPhone cannot meet without a PCoIP capable client.</p>
<p>It is like a 2 iron. No one uses it, but who wants to buy a set of golf clubs without a 2 iron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by @langonej</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>@langonej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Interesting thoughts here!  I personally have never been at a customer where the iPhone was a device that was intended to be used to connect into a Windows-based desktop.  
Is it a cool demo in a conference booth? Yes.  
Is it useful to some of the super-admins of the world? Yes.

Other than that, it&#039;s pure novelty.  

While some of your customers may be asking for the experience of using their iPhone to connect into a Windows-based desktop, I&#039;d encourage you to let them have a go from an iPad.  Once that realization sinks in, now ask them how they&#039;d like to try that out on a device a fraction of the size.

A few of my writings:
&quot;Tablet Users: Why Published Apps &gt; Published Desktops for Most&quot; http://thinkvirt.com/?q=node/287

&quot;Thirty Days Working Exclusively with the Apple iPad: A Business Traveler’s Perspective&quot;
http://thinkvirt.com/?q=node/252

I think when it comes to VDI a lot of customers are ultimately looking for guidance on what actually works in the real world; this is the job of the solution provider.

If an org won&#039;t sign off on VDI until you can show your iPhone connecting into a desktop, take a step back and discuss the merits of VDI and its appropriate use cases.

Cheers!

- Jason
@langonej</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Interesting thoughts here!  I personally have never been at a customer where the iPhone was a device that was intended to be used to connect into a Windows-based desktop.<br />
Is it a cool demo in a conference booth? Yes.<br />
Is it useful to some of the super-admins of the world? Yes.</p>
<p>Other than that, it&#8217;s pure novelty.  </p>
<p>While some of your customers may be asking for the experience of using their iPhone to connect into a Windows-based desktop, I&#8217;d encourage you to let them have a go from an iPad.  Once that realization sinks in, now ask them how they&#8217;d like to try that out on a device a fraction of the size.</p>
<p>A few of my writings:<br />
&#8220;Tablet Users: Why Published Apps &gt; Published Desktops for Most&#8221; <a href="http://thinkvirt.com/?q=node/287" rel="nofollow">http://thinkvirt.com/?q=node/287</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Thirty Days Working Exclusively with the Apple iPad: A Business Traveler’s Perspective&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://thinkvirt.com/?q=node/252" rel="nofollow">http://thinkvirt.com/?q=node/252</a></p>
<p>I think when it comes to VDI a lot of customers are ultimately looking for guidance on what actually works in the real world; this is the job of the solution provider.</p>
<p>If an org won&#8217;t sign off on VDI until you can show your iPhone connecting into a desktop, take a step back and discuss the merits of VDI and its appropriate use cases.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>- Jason<br />
@langonej</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read-Write NTFS on Mac by mvaughn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/29/read-write-ntfs-on-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>mvaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=890#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment and sharing the information. I will take a look at the fixes/workarounds you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment and sharing the information. I will take a look at the fixes/workarounds you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read-Write NTFS on Mac by Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/29/read-write-ntfs-on-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=890#comment-393</guid>
		<description>MacFUSE should be auto-removed if the OSXFUSE&#039;s &quot;MacFUSE Compatibility Layer&quot; is installed. If this is not the case, try removing MacFUSE manually and reinstall OSXFUSE afterwards.

A workaround for NTFS-3G&#039;s 15 seconds timeout error can be found at https://github.com/osxfuse/osxfuse/wiki/NTFS-3G-for-Mac-OS-X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacFUSE should be auto-removed if the OSXFUSE&#8217;s &#8220;MacFUSE Compatibility Layer&#8221; is installed. If this is not the case, try removing MacFUSE manually and reinstall OSXFUSE afterwards.</p>
<p>A workaround for NTFS-3G&#8217;s 15 seconds timeout error can be found at <a href="https://github.com/osxfuse/osxfuse/wiki/NTFS-3G-for-Mac-OS-X" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/osxfuse/osxfuse/wiki/NTFS-3G-for-Mac-OS-X</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by mvaughn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>mvaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reinforcing my thoughts, Keilor, I was sure that I could not be alone in what I was seeing out in the marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reinforcing my thoughts, Keilor, I was sure that I could not be alone in what I was seeing out in the marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by mvaughn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>mvaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Thanks for leaving a comment, Chas. Several of my friends from VMware have looked at this, I hope it will make it to someone that can influence VMware&#039;s opinions on the matter.

From your side, let your local account manager and systems engineer know. In fact, do that any time you have feedback or comments. It keeps them in the loop on what you are looking for and helps them better serve you. Every account manager I have worked with at VMware would welcome customer feedback and be glad to pass it on for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for leaving a comment, Chas. Several of my friends from VMware have looked at this, I hope it will make it to someone that can influence VMware&#8217;s opinions on the matter.</p>
<p>From your side, let your local account manager and systems engineer know. In fact, do that any time you have feedback or comments. It keeps them in the loop on what you are looking for and helps them better serve you. Every account manager I have worked with at VMware would welcome customer feedback and be glad to pass it on for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by mvaughn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>mvaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, Bilal. I agree, not a good platform. However, in those cases when you really need to apply a quick fix or get some information, and you are away from the office with only your cell phone...it can be a life saver. It has been for me on several occasions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Bilal. I agree, not a good platform. However, in those cases when you really need to apply a quick fix or get some information, and you are away from the office with only your cell phone&#8230;it can be a life saver. It has been for me on several occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by mvaughn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>mvaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-389</guid>
		<description>There are two parts to my frustration. One, WYSE Pocket Cloud costs $20. I already own it, but I regularly speak to customers that want this functionality (even if they will not actually use, Citrix has it and they want VMware to have it too) and do not want to pay $20 for it. The second issue is that PocketCloud can only connect via RDP. I want to enable my desktop to leverage the new &quot;Windows 7 3D Rendering&quot; features, but that requires setting the pool to be PCoIP only...meaning I could no longer get in with PocketCloud in a pinch. Because I do occasionally use my iPhone to get in for quick tweaks and fixes, I am unable to use the 3D rendering.

Would I use this often, no way. It is not well suited for accessing a Windows XP or 7 desktop. But when I do need it, when an admin does not want to drive an hour back to an office or to go home to perform a 2 minute fix, it is extremely valuable. Over 50% of mobile web browsing flows through iPhones, the footprint is only growing. When the competition touts access &quot;anytime, anywhere&quot;, answering with &quot;anytime you can get to a PC or tablet&quot; is not a good response. Most VDI deals I walk into are people trying to choose between Citrix and View, and access from an iPhone is the shiny feature everyone wants to try out in a POC or demo...even if they will likely never use it.

In a way, it is like putting heated seats on a car in Texas. Did I look for it on the sticker for my car...yes. Mainly because every other car I looked at had them and I was comparison shopping. Do I use them? Maybe 5-6 times a year. Though not having them would not have changed my car decision, it would have left a real negative impression. And, 5-6 times a year, that negative impression would have been remembered and reinforced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two parts to my frustration. One, WYSE Pocket Cloud costs $20. I already own it, but I regularly speak to customers that want this functionality (even if they will not actually use, Citrix has it and they want VMware to have it too) and do not want to pay $20 for it. The second issue is that PocketCloud can only connect via RDP. I want to enable my desktop to leverage the new &#8220;Windows 7 3D Rendering&#8221; features, but that requires setting the pool to be PCoIP only&#8230;meaning I could no longer get in with PocketCloud in a pinch. Because I do occasionally use my iPhone to get in for quick tweaks and fixes, I am unable to use the 3D rendering.</p>
<p>Would I use this often, no way. It is not well suited for accessing a Windows XP or 7 desktop. But when I do need it, when an admin does not want to drive an hour back to an office or to go home to perform a 2 minute fix, it is extremely valuable. Over 50% of mobile web browsing flows through iPhones, the footprint is only growing. When the competition touts access &#8220;anytime, anywhere&#8221;, answering with &#8220;anytime you can get to a PC or tablet&#8221; is not a good response. Most VDI deals I walk into are people trying to choose between Citrix and View, and access from an iPhone is the shiny feature everyone wants to try out in a POC or demo&#8230;even if they will likely never use it.</p>
<p>In a way, it is like putting heated seats on a car in Texas. Did I look for it on the sticker for my car&#8230;yes. Mainly because every other car I looked at had them and I was comparison shopping. Do I use them? Maybe 5-6 times a year. Though not having them would not have changed my car decision, it would have left a real negative impression. And, 5-6 times a year, that negative impression would have been remembered and reinforced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by Bilal Hashmi</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilal Hashmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-388</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree as the iphone client will not hurt. However I will be just a little reluctant to use a view client on my iPhone simply because I have fat fingers... I am not sure if my getting into my machine via my phone will enable me to fix things or only cause more frustrations..

Now ones/if the iPhone gets some projector type integration where I can beam my phone to the wall perhaps a view client would not be a bad idea at all. However, my fingers will still be fat but I will at least have a bigger screen to look at. I don&#039;t know I am a little iffy about the view client for iPhone.. perhaps thats sort of what VMware feels as well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree as the iphone client will not hurt. However I will be just a little reluctant to use a view client on my iPhone simply because I have fat fingers&#8230; I am not sure if my getting into my machine via my phone will enable me to fix things or only cause more frustrations..</p>
<p>Now ones/if the iPhone gets some projector type integration where I can beam my phone to the wall perhaps a view client would not be a bad idea at all. However, my fingers will still be fat but I will at least have a bigger screen to look at. I don&#8217;t know I am a little iffy about the view client for iPhone.. perhaps thats sort of what VMware feels as well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware View client for the iPhone by Carter Shanklin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mvaughn.us/2011/12/30/vmware-view-client-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Shanklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvaughn.us/?p=945#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Mark it will help if you detail some of the things you expect you would do with such a client. For me remote-desktop type stuff is only for absolute emergencies (laptop on fire sort of things.) I find it hard to believe anyone would do anything serious using such a small form factor, clearly we have different perspectives, I thought it was strange they released a Kindle Fire client I think even that is too small. Is this something you would lean on in a pinch? What would you (or your clients) do with it? Cite examples. Progress can be made if enough people believe in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark it will help if you detail some of the things you expect you would do with such a client. For me remote-desktop type stuff is only for absolute emergencies (laptop on fire sort of things.) I find it hard to believe anyone would do anything serious using such a small form factor, clearly we have different perspectives, I thought it was strange they released a Kindle Fire client I think even that is too small. Is this something you would lean on in a pinch? What would you (or your clients) do with it? Cite examples. Progress can be made if enough people believe in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

